This general formual is repeated globally in different ways. The "fact checkers" should be validating data and fact to improve the public discourse, but actually they are just enabling government spin and narrative control to degrade it and make truth impossible to find
In Norway for example the main "fact checker" organisation faktisk.no assembles the main media companies, but actually is linked to the Norwegian military's PR and in turn NATO
Basically the fack checker there is relay for ensuring NATO control over public discourse in the country. This was visible very clearly with the NordStream bombings, in which Norway was a central actor, but ZERO news diiscussion on the issues, only the NATO lie that Russia did itself, and blanket refusal to discuss the obvious que bono nor Sy Hersh's expose on it.
This general formual is repeated globally in different ways. The "fact checkers" should be validating data and fact to improve the public discourse, but actually they are just enabling government spin and narrative control to degrade it and make truth impossible to find
In Norway for example the main "fact checker" organisation faktisk.no assembles the main media companies, but actually is linked to the Norwegian military's PR and in turn NATO
https://www.faktisk.no/ansatte
https://www.forsvaretsforum.no/forsvarets-forum-medier-pressemelding/stian-eisentrager-forlater-forsvarets-forum/343489
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forsvarets_forum
Basically the fack checker there is relay for ensuring NATO control over public discourse in the country. This was visible very clearly with the NordStream bombings, in which Norway was a central actor, but ZERO news diiscussion on the issues, only the NATO lie that Russia did itself, and blanket refusal to discuss the obvious que bono nor Sy Hersh's expose on it.
So... does butter actually melt in Zuckerberg's mouth or not?